1000 Words: Don’t Ask!

In celebrity-obsessed America the most respected people speaking on the subjects of world events, social justice, human relations, economics, politics, and even hard science are Hollywood actors and pro athletes.

I mean, honestly, a man whom Matt Groenig and Co. characterized back in 2000 as a joke future president actually became the President of the United States, largely because he was a TV actor in a reality show. The American electorate voted him into the White House in 2016 almost solely because he’d become famous saying “You’re fired” countless times in NBC-TV’s “The Apprentice.” He’d never been a legislator or a diplomat or a student of global affairs or prepped any other way to become Leader of the Free World. People knew him because he came into their living rooms every Wednesday or Thursday night and that was plenty enough for them to say, “We’ll follow you.”

No movement, no idea, no cause gains traction if it doesn’t have Glenn Close (mental health), Angelina Jolie (refugees), Seth Rogen (Alzheimer’s), Gary Sinise (veterans), or, way back, Jenny McCarthy (antivaxx) stumping for it. In an April 2020 New York Times piece on celebrity activism headlined When Did We Start Taking Famous People Seriously? reporter Jessica Grose wrote that Al Jolson was the first celebrity political endorser, throwing his weight behind then-presidential candidate Warren G. Harding in 1920. Celebrity activisim has only grown in leaps and bounds since that time.

Donald Trump shilled for himself, natch, bringing the phenomenon to its current nadir.

An item I caught in Deadspin this AM got me to thinking about all this, for the umpteenth time. Deadspin is a gotcha-type daily sports news roundup that I read mainly for giggles. Today, reporter Cale Clinton broke the earthshaking news that NFL prospect Tyler Owens, late of Texas Tech University and soon to become a wealthy young lad after April’s pro football draft, has expounded on the nature of the cosmos. The cornerback/safety, Clinton reports, was quoted as saying, “I don’t believe in space.” Journalists furiously scribbled his pronouncements this week during the annual NFL Scouting Combine in Indianapolis where erstwhile college jocks show off their biceps and cartilages for the league’s general managers and head coaches. Owens was asked about his beliefs because he ran the fastest 40-yard dash among the hopeful pros gathered in Lucas Oil Stadium.

Well, golly, I too want to know what such a speedy defensive back thinks about the universe!

Owens explained: “I’m real religious so I think we’re in a dome right now. I don’t think there’s, like, other planets and stuff like that.” He went on to say he’d caught some flat-earth chat on YouTube, causing him to come to his conclusions. Other news sources report he actually said “…I think we’re alone right now,” rather than “in a dome.” No matter. His meaning is crystal clear either way, and it has nothing at all to do with space, planets, loneliness, or geometric structural forms.

The NFL decision makers at the Combine regularly assess the hopeful players in batteries of physical and intellectual tests designed to establish who the top greyhounds, acrobats, tightrope walkers, strongmen, throwers, rushers, tacklers, and field strategists are in each year’s crop of exiting college football players.

Yep, each and every participant in the 2024 NFL Scouting Combine is a college man, Owens among them. You know college, right? That place where the smartest scientists, researchers, philosophers, and professors prepare your teenager for the rigors of modern life, imparting the latest information about the nature of everything and anything.

Young Tyler Owens, presumably, having been thusly prepared by the faculty at Texas Tech, is now ready to take his place among the leaders of today and tomorrow.

“I thought I used to believe in the heliocentric thing where we used to revolve around the sun and stuff,” Owens continued. “But then I started seeing flat earth stuff and I was like, this is kind of interesting. They started bringing up valid points….”

I caution you not to dismiss young Tyler Owens for his utterances. Well, not too much, at least. He’s 22 years old, for pity’s sake. Do you want to be defined and/or condemned for the goofy stuff you did, said, or believed when you were 22? I think I was 18 when, one time, I told my mother I was a communist. Poor Ma. She gasped and wrung her hands. Which, now that I look back on it, was the main reason I said it. Many people believe a 22-year-old should be a tad more circumspect than an 18-year-old, but a guy devoting his life to the goal of becoming a pro football player can be excused for developing a bit more slowly in the realm of existential thought, especially one capable of running the fastest 40 yard dash at an annual NFL Scouting Combine.

For all we know, when he hits the age of 40 or 50 Tyler Owens may look back on his words and cringe.

If you care to rail against anybody, it should be whoever the reporter was who put a microphone in Tyler’s face and prompted him to tell the world about the cosmos.

It shouldn’t matter to anybody with a clear conscious and a rational sense of priorities what even the best cornerback/safety in the NFL today thinks about anything other than the nuances of playing cornerback/safety. We don’t quiz plumbers or bus drivers or McDonald’s managers or IT geeks on their views concerning the solar system and other such things. So why does anybody care what a potential NFL player thinks about it?

Or an actor? Or a rock star? Or the star and producer of a reality TV show?

Of course, I’m bashing my head against a brick wall because the vast majority of us are dying to know what the likes of Beyoncé and Harry Styles think about the Israel/Hamas War, global warming, AI, and substance abuse. Hell, Beyoncé might even become president one day.

In that case, I wonder what her thoughts about space and the planets are.

1000 Words: Wanna Fight?

Long ago, a martial arts teacher told me the first and most important lesson he wanted to impart to his students was, Do everything you can to avoid conflict.

I’d expressed concern to him that the martial arts craze that began sweeping the nation back in the 1970s was encouraging boys and young men to violence. And, believe me, boys and young men don’t need any extra encouragement in that matter. I’ve long held that were I to be named King of the World, I’d ship all males aged 18-24 on rocket ships to the Moon, where the XY-chromosomed could reside until they passed out of those feral ages. Living for many adult years in neighborhoods reigned by gangbangers hardened that wish within me. Then, after moving to Bloomington and witnessing the drunken, preening, strutting, brawling, sexual predating deportment of so-called educated lads, I realized Male Assholiness is a universal condition, not limited to those in poor neighborhoods with bad schools and scads of street drugs.

Don’t get me wrong: I would have been among the first rocket-load of temporary exiles. In fact, I should have been shipped off the moment I reached the age of 13. I could have safely returned to Earth when I was 18. My schoolteachers always told me I was advanced for my age.

That martial arts teacher, I’m sure, would have been aghast at the notion of all those Stand Your Ground laws benighted states began enacting a number of years ago. The sensei said his students’ first response to someone snarling, staring, menacing, or threatening is to turn and walk away. His students were to do so again and again. So long as the putative bully didn’t have you cornered or up against the wall, it was your responsibility to defuse the situation. Only a very strong, confident person, this teacher said, could maintain peace.

Then, there was the Trayvon Martin case in Florida (where else?) In February of 2012 Martin, a Black kid, was walking through a predominantly white neighborhood where he was confronted by George Zimmerman, a self-appointed neighborhood protector. Zimmerman demanded to know what Martin was doing there. Martin told him to go fuck himself and tried to go on his way. One thing led to another and Martin ended up getting shot and killed. Zimmerman was eventually brought up on a second-degree murder charge. He was acquitted under Florida’s Stand Your Ground law.

Zimmerman already had called the cops before coming out of his house to face down Martin. They were only moments away when the shot was fired. Zimmerman had stood before Martin and when Martin tried to push his way past, a fistfight ensued and Martin wound up pounding the hell out of him.

All Zimmerman had to do was get out of Martin’s way. He’d already done what he considered his civic duty. He’d dropped a dime on the stranger in his midst and let him know he was under observation. Instead, Zimmerman stood his ground, with the result being a dead teenager.

BTW: we’re not even taking into account the fact that Zimmerman was spooked by the presence of a Black kid on his block, a detail that would turn him into a Right Wing media darling. For pity’s sake, if we start letting Black kids walk down white neighborhood streets, what’ll be next? A Black family living next door? A Black president? (Too late, by the time of the incident, Barack Obama already was nearing the tail-end of his first term — another reason the likes of Zimmerman became such a Fox News/YouTube celebrity. Someone’s gotta hold back the tide!)

Anyway, the Martin killing cemented the idea that there are only two kinds of people in this holy land: Us and Them.

Now, news channels, social media, and all other forms of public discourse are nothing more than arenas for the armchair gladiators among us. I’m always right; you’re always wrong. That’s why I have chosen the sensei’s path in regard to online dialogue. I try like hell to avoid chiming in on tête-à-têtes on that old people’s home called Facebook. No matter which stance I take, I run the risk of being called a Nazi, a commie, an idiot, a pedant, or a mansplainer. One guy once ridiculed me by saying I was using big words in a Facebook argument.

Not terribly long ago, I posted my reaction to Donald Trump taking the Fifth in a legal deposition. I remarked that he was the first ex-president in US history ever to take advantage of the protection against self-incrimination. That’s all. One guy, an old elementary school chum, sprang up almost instantly, railing against me. My only response? “Let’s just say we disagree on this point.” Funny thing is, I don’t even know what we were disagreeing on.

I haven’t really posted anything political since then — and that’s just fine by me.

Right now, there are only two sides to the Israel-Hamas War. Mine and yours. If I disagree with one iota of your position, I am either a bloodthirsty, savage terrorist lover or a bloodthirsty, colonialist despot lover.

The contretemps over Palestinian artist Samia Halaby’s cancelled exhibition at Indiana University’s Eskanazi Museum is the latest case in point. It reflects the larger Israel-Palestine fray. In this college town, Israel is, and always has been, an oppressive, colonial power and the Palestinians are plucky, resilient victims. There’s lot of truth in both statements. Just as it’s true that Israel can defend itself and Hamas wanted to ignite a bloody war.

The week after Hamas carried out its brutal attack on Israeli civilians in October, I said on this global communications colossus that I’m taking no sides, as both are full of shit. Events since then have proven me out: Israel’s response is over the top, bordering on deranged.

I won’t go on social media to say October 7th was an evil act, nor will I assert the incursion into Gaza is barbaric. Even though I believe both things.

Like the sensei advised, I’m avoiding the conflict. On social media, at least.

 

1000 Words: Black on Black (and other screen screeds)

Perhaps the most unrecognized figure from the civil rights era, Bayard Rustin, is the subject a a biopic running on Netflix these days. Rustin was directed by a black person, George C. Wolfe. It was co-written by a black person, Julian Breece. It was produced by a black company, Michelle and Barack Obama’s Higher Ground Productions. And, of course, it stars a galaxy of black actors including Chris Rock as Roy Wilkins and Jeffrey Wright as Adam Clayton Powell.

Rustin.

I plan to watch the movie by the end of this coming weekend. It’ll be a breath of fresh air after spending two weeks almost continually flat on my back thanks to either the mother of all flus or this year’s COVID variation. I took a COVID test and it read negative but, I understand, these home tests often read negative if you do them too late and, to be sure, I swabbed my nose about a week and a half after experiencing the first symptoms. So maybe I had COVID and maybe I didn’t.

In any case, I spent most of that down time, while awake, watching the entire run of The Sopranos. Eighty-six episodes. I wouldn’t have done such a thing had I not been unable to do any other damned thing. The experience hardened within me a philosophy I’ve held dearly for years. No serial TV program should last more than three years. After thirty or forty episodes, the scriptwriters become desperate, concocting weird, preposterous new situations to challenge the characters and continue to suck viewers further into a rabbit hole. You’ve heard of, natch, the concept of jumping the shark, where the fabulously popular sitcom Happy Days in its fifth season brought Fonzie, in full leather jacket, to some body of water where, to prove his manhood or bravery or what the hell ever, he leaped over a man-eating shark while water skiing. Here’s Wikipedia defining jumping the shark:

…a pejorative that is used to argue that a creative work or entity has reached a point in which it has exhausted its core intent and is introducing new ideas that are discordant with, or an extreme exaggeration of, its original purpose.

In other words, the Happy Days brain trust had run out of good ideas. Ideas that made sense. Jumping the shark became a cultural touchstone, describing precisely what I urge: once a program completes its third year, quit it. Do something else. Come up with another story. Don’t put Henry Winkler in baggy swim trunks and a leather jacket.

Same thing with The Sopranos. Tony Soprano kills Chris Moltisanti by pinching his nostrils together after a car wreck. Carmella Soprano gets jilted by her son’s high school guidance counselor. Tony gulps magic mushrooms. Paulie Walnuts sees a vision of the Virgin Mary. Huh?

All this after several seasons of riveting, dramatic conflict, with credible story lines and compelling character relationships. But, TV  being TV, producers and networks are driven, almost molecularly, to squeeze every last dime out of a property.

I recall another serial I got into when I was sick a few years ago, Ricky Gervais’s After Life. It’s the story of a curmudgeonly widower who decides to punish the world after his wife dies of cancer. The first season ran six episodes, detailing his pain, his backlash, his psychological realizations, and, in the final episode, his surrender to the reality that he must move beyond his agony and begin anew. He meets a woman in a park, they hit it off, and you know he’s on the road to recovery. He’s a normal human again. It’s a sweet, endearing moment. And it should have been the end of the series. But it wasn’t. Two more seasons followed. I didn’t watch any of the rest of it. After that Season 1 finale, it would become a soap opera.

Which is what a lot of premium TV dramas become. Breaking Bad. Mad Men. The Sopranos. Who’s sleeping with whom. Whose heart is broken. Who’s a cad. Who’s a slut.

I just don’t care.

Anyway, Rustin. Another bugbear of mine has been the avalanche of books on American racism that nearly buried us in the wake of Black Lives Matter. Many of the titles were written by white people shaking their fingers at other white people for the shitty deal Black people have gotten in this holy land for 400 years. When I was working at the bookstore, people in droves would come in to get the latest detention slip of a book, some customers carrying armfuls of them to the checkout counter. Make no mistake, there were important, required titles published in that time, including The New Jim Crow, by Michelle Alexander and Between the World and Me, by Ta-nehisi Coates. You may hate on me for this, but I could never shake the feeling that so many of these book purchasers were virtue signaling. And, yeah, there is such a thing as virtue signaling, even though the loons on the Right embraced the term years ago and turned it into an insult.

Watching Rustin will be refreshing because it was done mainly by Black people. Of course, Bayard Rustin was a homosexual so he faced crushing discrimination on two fronts, not the least from his own skin-color brethren and sisteren. Keep in mind that it wasn’t until Barack Obama had become president that he finally publicly embraced same-sex marriage, so jittery was he over alienating millions of church-going Black voters who viewed homosexuality with visceral abhorrence.

For too long, Spike Lee was the only black film director the average person could name. He was famously snubbed by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences time and again at Oscar™ time. Thankfully things have changed in very recent years. Now, Ava DuVernay, Jordan Peele, Julie Dash, Barry Jenkins, Dee Rees, and many others of color are bankable, recognizable figures in Hollywood.

It’s been more than sixty years since Bayard Rustin helped organize the March on Washington. I wonder if he would have been surprised it took this long for Black people to be recognized in one of America’s signature industries.

Audience Or Not, The Show Goes On

I wrote a brilliant, insightful, incisive post today for this global communications colossus. I typed it up, edited it, made sure all the links were in good working order, sweated over a brief, splendid headline…, and then parked it in the Drafts folder, where it’ll remain forever (or at least until whatever extinction event wipes out any trace of our civilization).

That folder, WordPress tells me, now is crammed with 65 such lovingly-composed, to-date unread by the masses screeds, pleadings, explications, and manifestos. At an average of 1000 per, that’s about 65,000 words-worth of Big Mike-ness, a decent-sized book. I went into every single one believing with all my heart that this one, this post, is gonna change the world. Or at least make someone chuckle. Or just go Hmm.

I’m not even counting all the posts, completed or not, that I trashed because 1) they stunk or 2) I didn’t care as much about the topic as I originally thought I did. That’s a pretty deep pile of rhetoric (a euphemism, for all you creative writing students).

I started this Pencil thing, La Cosa Mia, to hone my craft and, to borrow a line from Lenny Bruce, scream out loud, Hey Ma! Look at me!

So even though you’ve been denied that plus-65,000-word slab of my perspicacity and precious prose, this Pencil thing is still working for me. And I suppose this hoarding of my clever literary skill is analogous the pianist playing Sicilienne (Opus 78, Gabriel Fauré) at home, alone, the sound waves radiating out, unheard by other human ears, and ultimately disappearing into the universe. She — and I — just have to do what we do, regardless of whether you know it or not.

There are as many reasons to put something out in the world as there are not to. The reason I didn’t publish today’s post is the same reason that pianist doesn’t shout out her front door, Hey neighbors, I’m gonna play Sicilienne, C’mon over!

I did it and that’s enough for now.

Aw, what the hell, let’s just listen to Malika Baimagambetova playing Sicilienne:

1000 Words: What’s Your Name? Who’s Your Daddy?

When I was small I used to love to pull mail out of the slot in the  front door, bring it to the dining room table, and place it in a neat pile there. I felt as though I was doing something important for the family. After all, there were gas bills and grocery store flyers and, once a year, Dad’s new license plates — all vital missives and packages from big locations in the city and even other states. Just carrying and arranging them made me feel as though I was helping my parents keep up with the demands of the enormous outside world.

The vast majority of mail was addressed to Mr. Joseph J. Glab, 1621 N. Natchez Ave., Chicago, 35, Ill. I’m harkening back to the days before Zip Codes, when, for example, 35 was our “zone number.” Not only that, our state abbreviation was a three-letter thing as opposed to today’s USPS two-letter designation. Things change.

Every once in a great while a letter would come for Mrs. Joseph J. Glab. The first time I saw that, I figured the sender had misspelled Mr. Dad wasn’t a woman! “Hey Ma, look at this,” I called out, bringing the letter to her in the kitchen, figuring she’d get a kick out of the error. She glanced at the envelope and said, “Yeah, that’s for me.”

“For you?” I said. “But they put Dad’s name down.”

She explained that that was the rule. A woman was addressed by her husband’s name.

I walked away, puzzled. I couldn’t figure out why Ma would be called Dad’s name. Or why any woman would be called by her husband’s name, for that matter. I was six or so years old and just beginning to realize not all that much makes any damned sense in this crazy world. Things have changed. Sort of.

Here we are, nearly 75 years after the publication of Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex. More than 50 years after Women’s Lib became a thing. Forty years since the first woman Supreme Court Justice was named. Women run major countries and chair boards of directors. Are mayors and governors. Police officers, firefighters, managers, airline pilots, astronauts. Hell, a woman won the popular vote in the 2016 US presidential election. A woman today serves as our nation’s vice president.

No one would ever think to send a letter to The Loved One addressed to Mrs. Michael G. Glab.

Still, I’m puzzled.

Despite all the advances women have made in my lifetime — they can’t be fired for being pregnant, they can have credit cards and get home loans, they can run down to the CVS and buy contraceptives even if they’re not married, they can raise hell if co-workers pat them on the ass; things they couldn’t do in 1962 or even ’72 — tons of women get married these days and take their husbands’ surnames.

The practice of a woman changing her last name to her husband’s goes back more than a thousand years, acc’d’g to The History Behind Maiden vs. Married Names on the Minnesota Bride website. Before that, surnames didn’t matter all that much. Under English common law, the page reads, a female’s entire existence was defined by “coverture.” That is, she was “covered” either by her daddy-o or her husband. The law held that “women had no legal identity apart from their spouse.”

The US Supreme Court scoffed at the notion as far back as 1966 when it ruled in United States v. Yazell that a wife was not necessarily responsible for her husband’s debts. Justice Abe Fortas wrote that the “quaint doctrine” of  coverture was “peculiar and obsolete.”

In these days of nearly fetishistic concern for identity and individual specialness, young women in droves continue to take their husbands’ surnames. They become, in essence, Mrs. HUSBAND”S NAME HERE.

As I said above, I remain puzzled. Women choose their friends, their lovers, their political party, their gender, their career, their marital status, their motherhood, their tribe. Helen Reddy famously sang in 1972 “I am strong, I am invincible, I am woman.” Yet 52 years later women continue to say, in practice, I am his.

I’ve been asking women, both married and not, why for a while now. I’ve asked women who’ve taken their husbands’ names and women who aren’t yet married what they’ll do when the time comes. I’ve asked young women and old. Funny thing is, the most common response I get is the tilted head and a bemused, “Hmm?”

Truth is, my unscientific study has found, most women are as puzzled about the whole thing as I am.

Which is baffling considering a woman who gets married and chooses to retain her birth name doesn’t have to do a darned thing. Whereas a newlywed who wants to take her husband’s name must get a new drivers license, Social Security card, credit card, and passport. She must change the name on her savings and checking accounts and her mortgage. She must jump through hoops to adopt her new surname. It’s a huge pain in her ass.

I asked one newly married woman why she chose her husband’s last name. “I’m proud to be part of his family,” she said. This brings us to an uncomfortable reality, that some women have suffered childhood traumas — abuses, say — and are more than happy to shed a surname that represents painful memories. But that can’t account for all the women who continue to honor that “peculiar and obsolete” custom.

Let’s just call it inertia. People who no longer go to church still celebrate Christmas. A lot of Jews and Muslims still shun shellfish and pork. Some men still open doors for women. Hell, in some states even the wedding ceremony itself is outdated — all a couple has to do to make their union legal is sign their marriage license.  And women have been taking their husbands’ last names for a thousand years.

People say, that’s the way it’s always been done. So they do it.

But, jeez, people — it’s your name.

1000 Words: Who We Are

The “we” being the people who live, have lived, and who will live, in the United States of America.

And how should I know who we are?

Well, around about July or August, I don’t know exactly when — because it’s not important, and I’ll reveal why shortly — I started working on an ambitious and somewhat loony personal project: a timeline of American history.

It’s the kind of thing I’ve dreamed about doing for years, when I’d retire. I threw off the chains of wage-slavedom circa the end of April. Earlier that month I’d gotten my third major surgery in a period of two and a half years, and was able to walk again — Huzzah! I felt so damned good that the very idea of going back to work at the bookstore post-physical therapy seemed as attractive to me as whacking myself repeatedly on the head with a cast-iron skillet.

So I retired. Then I took on some hot projects, including writing a Deep Dive piece for the Limestone Post about Lake Monroe’s water. I also took on doing a history of WFHB, the community radio station that carries my weekly Big Talk interview program (Thursdays at 5:30pm on 91.3 FM or anytime online). I squeezed in a fun piece on the cartoon magazine, Funny Times, the editorial office of which has been relocated to Bloomington. And, I decided, it was time to do my dream project.

Funny thing is, I’m busier now than I ever was before retirement. Which I figured’d be the case. Mind, body, and spirit soar when one isn’t laboring under the yoke of…, well, labor. I can’t explain it any better than that.

So, I started drawing up my own American history timeline back in the hot weather months. In doing so, I realized elementary and high schools have been teaching history all wrong for far too many years, something I’ve suspected since I was an elementary-slash-high school student. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, try picking up a copy of James Loewen’s 1995 bestseller, Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong. Thumb through it and get educated on how brilliantly fascinating real history is compared to the white-washed, PR flack, happy horseshit the likes of Mrs. Bertram, Mrs, Schmidt, Mr. Townsend, and Mr. Thalamer taught me — and their counterparts taught you.

The fact that none of us of a certain age were brought by our teacher to within a country mile of hearing about things like the Tulsa Race Massacre of 1921, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, Helen Keller’s socialism, Woodrow Wilson’s white supremacy, the CIA-sponsored coups in Iran and Guatemala, or even the US Navy’s secret agreement with Lucky Luciano’s Mob to ensure New York City’s World War II ports’d be safe from Nazi sabotage is indictment enough.

Most kids say history is among their least favorite classes. Only math class is less palatable to most of them. Of course, there are no lies or whitewashing in math class so I have no idea what to do about that.

What we can do about history class is start telling the truth. Unvarnished, uncomfortable, yet riveting and illuminating truth. I know for a fact I’d be rapt, when in school, reading about Stalin’s spies at Los Alamos, Lincoln’s depression, JFK’s love life, or how the other Project Mercury astronauts chafed at John Glenn’s scoldings to keep their pants zipped.

I began my timeline by googling any and all historical timelines. Each of them misses a lot of stuff that happened in and around these shores and plains. I figured the more timelines I could consult, the more stuff I wouldn’t miss. A lot of timelines are subject-specific, like Ferris State University’s Jim Crow Museum Timeline, the National Park Service’s American Revolution Timeline, or the Watergate Chronology, so they go deeper into their respective events than, say, Wikipedia’s timelines of events in each year, which I used as a skeleton for the project.

All of them, of course, are based on dates and years. Dates and years — those micro-nuggets of data our history teachers stood over us with whips so we’d memorize them as much as our own names. Yeah, I followed that paradigm, indexing each event in American history by year and date. But it really doesn’t matter if the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor on the 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, or 9th of December, 1941. What matters is context. What matters is the why and in what relation to any number of other factors.

What matters, for example, in the Pearl Harbor attack was the US had embargoed Japanese oil imports — an act of war — and that Hitler was thrilled upon learning of the sneak attack because he figured the US then would be too busy in the Pacific to care that he was taking over Europe and killing Jews. Context.

In drawing up my own personal history of the United States, I could see how this nation grew and learned — and didn’t learn — and become a mighty empire and championed freedom and democracy and backed tin-pot dictators and claimed all men are created equal and allowed the buying and selling of human beings and…, and…, and…. As Kurt Vonnegut loved to write, and so it goes.

Of all the empires this Earth has seen, ours is the most contradictory, the most baffling, the most schizophrenic. We’ve been good and bad. We’ve been brilliant and ignorant. We’ve pushed the limits of human achievement and stuck our heads in the sand. We’ve created advancements in medicine, engineering, astrophysics, literature, theater, song, sport, and any and all possible fields of human endeavor. We shoot each other, rape each other, rob from the poor, segregate our neighborhoods, launch missiles, pollute the air, and commit any and all crimes against humanity better than any other country.

Why? Because we’re the most diverse country ever to exist. We represent everything good and everything bad Homo sapiens has ever learned to do or can imagine to do, no matter where that Homo came from.

We are humanity.

Big Talk: Looking for Dad

My weekly radio interview program, Big Talk, airs every Thursday on WFHB, 91.3 FM, or always and forever on the ‘FHB website. The podcast usually posts precisely at 6:00pm, just as the broadcast concludes.

I’ve been doing that gig since 2014. Big Talk started out as an eight-minute feature on the Daily Local News. By 2017 I was chomping at the bit to get my own stand-alone slot on the station’s programming schedule and then-news director Wes Martin helped me jump through the hoops to get it done. I’ve had hundreds of guests on in the nearly ten years the show’s been a thing. It’s basically a one-person operation with me handling booking, research, studio set-up, engineering, hosting, editing, post-production, and, for chrissakes, keeping the Big Production Room as tidy as possible.

My first guest, way back in January ’14 was cartoonist Nate Powell, who’s penned a passel of fabulous graphic novels, includes the three-volume classic, March, with the late civil rights legend and Georgia congressperson John Lewis. Following him, I brought on Bloomington’s grand dame of politics, Charlotte Zietlow. My chat with her inspired me to pitch a book idea to her and, lo and behold, six years later our book Minister’s Daughter: One Life, Many Lives hit the bookstores. For a couple of years, I was able to turn Big Talk editions into print profiles on Limestone Post for my regular column, “Big Mike’s B-Town.”

Some of my favorite shows have featured the likes of Dan “Carp” Combs, the homespun philosopher who’s long served as a local township trustee here in Bloomington; Pete Buttigieg, then-mayor of South Bend who came to town to speak to a house party of women voters (and, as I chatted with him in the kitchen that afternoon, I concluded he was a fellow with his eye set on the White House); Debbie Herbenick, the Indiana University sex researcher, Joe Varga, the IU labor historian; Ed Schwartzman, the restaurateur whose young son took his own life; Laura Lane, longtime Herald Times reporter; and Nancy Hiller, author, master woodworker, and all-around good egg, whom I had on several times.

I’ve had CIA spies, New York Times bestselling authors, filmmakers, scientists, cops, magicians (well, alright, illusionists), pizza moguls, comedy club proprietors, singer-songwriters, poets, painters, Hula Hoop-sters, historians, a couple of alumni from the Firesign Theater, and even a cos-player who wrote a book about raising Viking children.

When I’m on my deathbed and I look back on my far-too-short life, I’ll be able to say my greatest talent was getting people to talk about themselves. I’ll reveal the secret of why and how I became adept at that: my dad never really spoke with me. That’s the kind of bird he was. A good friend once tried to ask me, apropos of one thing or another, “When your father talked to you did he….” I put my hand up and said, “Hold it right there. My father never talked to me.” My friend couldn’t believe it, but it was true.

Other than yelling at me or telling me to do something, Daddy-o was mum. I figured he didn’t care much for me. Then I learned he was quite the bon-vivant at times when he was younger. He’d tell stories and jokes and even dance a polka at family gatherings and parties. I was able to conclude it wasn’t me, it was him. I was, in a very profound way, growing up.

Dad, I can only conclude, was terribly depressed for the last quarter century of his life. He’d come of age in an era when seeing a therapist was about as likely for a working class man as owning a tuxedo. So, my diagnosis is pure guesswork. But he exhibited all the classic symptoms, including an inability to connect with others and to demonstrate even the slightest hint of affection.

When I tried to work through my own depression under the care of a string of therapists, social workers, psychologists, and even the odd priest and nun (honestly, I’d gotten to a point where I’d try anything to get out of my emotional morass), all those experts assured me Daddy-o was a textbook case and that my malaise was clearly inherited.

One day, when I was suffering through the loss of a love (my fault; I was a young knucklehead), and the pain I felt was greater than any other human had ever experienced, I collapsed in a heap on my parents’ front porch. I heard Ma, inside, say to Dad, “Joe, go out there and help him. He needs you!”

Dad slowly emerged. He knew himself well enough to realize rescuing a knuckleheaded 23-year old from heart-pain was not one of his fortes. He sat on the stoop next to me. That, in itself, was novel inasmuch as he normally did everything in his power to avoid contact with other humans. “Jeez,” I thought, “they must really think I’m in bad shape.” (They were right: I’d even been ideating suicide.)

My heart felt as though it would burst just because my father had chosen to sit close to me. He asked me what was wrong and I told him about the girl who’d given me the gate. He didn’t respond, because he never did. So — and I have no idea why I did this — I asked him how he knew Ma was the one for him. Mirabile dictu, he opened up. He told me the story of meeting my mother.

As a teenager, he hung out with his pals at Hanson Park on Chicago’s northwest side. One afternoon a traveling girls softball team was playing there. The girl playing short centerfield caught his eye. She had curly hair and belly-caught pop-ups, like an old-time grocer catching a falling can of corn in his apron. Dad was smitten. He said, “I took one look at her and said, ‘I’m gonna marry that gal one day.'”

Ma & Dad, Summer, 1945.

The story itself was beautiful, but the fact that Dad actually shared it with me sent me over the edge. I sobbed, deeply and loudly, for long minutes. Dad was baffled: “What’d I say? What’s goin’ on?” He never would know, coming from the era and background he did.

That was the turning point in my heartbroken summer of 1979. I started healing.

So, let me amend my thesis: Dad did talk to me. Once.

From that minute on, my goal in life became to try to get people to tell me their stories. Who knows? Maybe I was trying to recreate that cathartic emotional release, that flood of endorphins or whatever other body drugs that start splashing around when one experiences deep joy or sadness. Or maybe I concluded that if I could get Dad to talk to me, I could get anybody to do it. I don’t know. I don’t need to know.

I only know it’s what I’ve done all my life, in print, online, and on the radio.

Another amendment: my first Big Talk wasn’t with Nate Powell. It was with my Dad that August night on the stoop in 1979.

Quick Hit: The Scum Card

“You’re just scum.” So says Nikki Haley to Vivek Ramaswamy on last night’s GOP debate stage. I’ve got to admit, I liked it. It was her way of saying fuck you to him.

It’s not something that should be bandied about promiscuously in a so-called civilized political debate but people like forceful, plain-language, from the heart speech from their politicians. It goes a long way to explain Donald Trump’s appeal. He says fuck you constantly to anybody and everybody who gets under his skin. Of course, he goes way, way, way, way overboard with it, but there’s that percentage of people who admire his candor and clear disregard for niceties and soft language. They’re tired of mealy-mouthed, forked-tongue blather.

It’s something I wish the Democrats would learn. Hillary tried it with her “basket of deplorables” line in ’16, and then she immediately walked it back. Dang mang, she should have doubled down on it. It would have done her better than apologizing and recanting.

But, of course, there must be a boundary — how about this: Everybody in every presidential candidate debate gets one “Don’t be an asshole” card that they get to use when a rival candidate acts like…, well, an asshole. Haley could have used hers yesterday. And then, once each party chooses a candidate, she or he gets two “You’re full of shit” cards to use when the other side inevitably says something stupid or outright lies.

For instance, one of Trump’s GOP rivals could have pulled out their “Don’t be an asshole” card when he claimed thousands of Arab-Americans danced in the streets of New Jersey while the Twin Towers were falling. And then, should Trump bring up the 2020 election “steal” when he and Biden debate, Biden should pull out one of his “You’re full of shit” cards.

One more card: every major party candidate gets a “Fuck you” card, to be used only by permission of the debate moderator or the Federal Election commission when, for example, somebody like Trump says something like “Only I can fix it.” Biden would apply for permission to use his card, get it, and then say, “Aw, fuck you, Donald!”

Political discourse would be slightly rawer but still somewhat controlled.

1000 Words: The War Species

I take no side in the latest Middle East dust-up. Of course, “dust-up” is almost an insulting term considered some 4000 people — mostly innocents — have died in the Israeli-Hamas War.

It’s not that I take no side in any war. For instance, I’m four-square in favor of Ukraine kicking the living shit out of the Russian invaders in their war. These two wars are the ones we, in this holy land, pay exclusive attention to. Your neighbors and relatives’ll wring their hands and moan about what a horrible and dangerous world we live in based only on their knowledge of those two conflicts while remaining unaware that some 110 wars, as defined by international law, are raging to one extent or another around the globe.

That’s right: one freaking hundred and ten wars are turning tens of thousands of soldiers into hamburger and hundreds of thousands, even millions, of mothers, fathers, aunts, uncles, brothers, sisters, dear friends, and acquaintances into grieving, juddering wrecks.

These numbers come from the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. The postgraduate school in  Switzerland monitors all the shooting wars going on across this mad planet, a hobby that keeps its faculty and students busier than celebrity gossip mongers, if that can be possible. The Geneva Academy finds that the hottest spots in the world are Africa and, natch, the Middle East where, together, some 45 wars are flaring as you read this. The vast majority of us don’t give the slightest damn about bloodshed in Africa, so long as it doesn’t interfere with the continuous flow of oil, precious metals, or other resources that allow us to play incessantly with electronic devices, scoot around in our cars, sink our retirement savings into, or hoard to keep out of Chinese hands. By such means, we can pretend that all is well outside our borders until, as occurred nearly two weeks ago, thugs and hoodlums started whacking the crap out of each other with moms, babies, nurses, doctors, professors, sanitation workers, cabaret singers, poets, and other bystanders suffering a shockingly outsized share of the bodily damage.

Well, maybe not so shockingly. Consider the fact that in World War II, the crème de la crème of organized human slaughter, the estimated number of deaths ranges from 45 to 85 million. Nobody could ever really pin that number down because, well, our technology was so good and the ferocity with which we used it so over the top that entire big cities were wiped off the map. It would have been as if Houston or Chicago were leveled, with countless Louisvilles, Oklahoma Cities, Sacramentos, Newarks, Albuquerques, and more disappearing under clouds of thick, black smoke. Sure, millions of soldiers died but their number was dwarfed by the incineration and butchering of just plain folks. Census and identification records similarly were scorched into ash so who knows how many people ceased to be in Dresden or Nagasaki.

Again, not that I particularly blame the Allies for unleashing their murderous fury. The Axis Powers were vicious, sociopathic mass murderers who had to be stopped and the only hammers we had against them were rifles, cannons, tanks and, ultimately, atomic bombs. But avid homicidal maniacs like Britain’s Air Marshall Arthur “Bomber” Harris and the US Army Air Corps’ Gen. Curtis LeMay both acknowledged their side had to win, otherwise each would be strung up as war criminals had the contest turned out differently. The lesson? If you want to win a war, your generals had better be more bloodthirsty than their generals.

As stated in this global communications colossus time and again, it’s my deeply held belief that we humans love the hell out of war. It excites us, moves us, even tumesces many of us in certain anatomical locales. Speaking of world war, the Great War, which necessarily had to be renamed World War I, was America’s first big foray into international mayhem. Being that our non-indigenous populace at the time hadn’t experienced waves of foreign troops sweeping across our soil, ravaging our homes, plundering our goods, and raping a large swath of our citizenry, the song “Over There” became a huge hit, parades for departing troops were held in most big cities, young men longed to enlist, and their moms and lovers urged them on to become heroes. Next thing anybody knew, thousands of American soldiers were being shipped back, armless, legless, paralyzed, poison gassed, filled with shrapnel and bullets, and mentally and emotionally crippled by the blood and guts they’d witnessed.

Who knew?

Well, anybody should have. Only we humans like to forget all the lessons of war just as soon as the latest war is ended. Then we go back to romanticizing it, even cherishing it.

That’s certainly what the young warriors of Hamas and the Israel Defense Forces do — and have done for decades. And it’s what we did when Vietnam was gradually becoming a recognizable term in 1964 and ’65. Both Hamas and the IDF can cite atrocities and provocations by the other side as justification for their martial zeal. Many Palestinians have been trying to destroy Israel and eliminate Jews in the Middle East since before the Hebrew homeland was established in 1947. And Israelis, the Holocaust still fresh in their memories, respond to every insult or attack in a manner that makes the original offense resemble a mosquito bite, Israel’s message being, Don’t fuck with us or we’ll fuck back with you times ten.

All wars are justified by the warring parties. All wars are fought for god and freedom. Yep, even the Nazis and the militarists of Japan told their respective people the blood they were about to shed was a task blessed by god and that liberty would be the reward.

Hitler and Goebbels said so. Tojo said so. Roosevelt, Churchill, Stalin and every other leader urging his country to take up arms said so. Says so.

What Hamas did was indefensible. What Israel is doing in return is similarly so. Neither side needs me to endorse it.

1000 Words: Why A Thousand?

I’d known from my earliest days that writing was my talent, that words were precious gems, that my pen and typewriter would become as indispensable as my arms and legs. Before I really attended school, I knew writing’d be my forte. I missed most of my kindergarten year with some weird chronic fever. I spent the vast majority of that time off thumbing through my family’s World Book Encyclopedia volumes. Slowly but surely, all those squiggles on the page became scrutable to me. I taught myself to read.

So it was almost predestined that words would become my life.

The World Book Encyclopedia.

Whatever that fever was, by first grade it was gone and so I spent my days from age five through 18 in classrooms. I’d much rather have been anyplace else. Any place. The Prussian-style schoolrooms of my youth were, hands down, the least likely places a person of my temperament, energy, concentration, and discipline (or lack thereof) could thrive in. Sitting still, paying attention, keeping quiet, “applying” myself, obeying, following instructions — I had little capacity for any of those talents and abilities. That is, if they are, indeed, talents and abilities.

All I wanted to do was run, jump, laugh, yell, joke, tease, ride my bike, and hit a ball. And read. I was a voracious reader. I knew that encyclopedia. I knew what the atomic bomb was, who Einstein was, what Ancient Rome was, that Woodrow Wilson was a president, that the keeping of critters on a farm was once know as “animal husbandry,” that Churchill was portly, and the Empire State Building was the tallest in the world. I knew this stuff long before any of my classmates did because I devoured that encyclopedia, as well as the daily newspaper. We got the Chicago Sun-Times Monday through Saturday and the Tribune and American on Sunday. I read them all, skipping the middle sections (the obituaries and business). I knew who Castro was and Willy Brandt and Nikita Khrushchev and Dean Rusk and Alan B. Shepard. I knew trouble was brewing in the Dominican Republic and that Charles de Gaulle was pretty much a jerk.

I Knew Who They Were.

Even my love of baseball was based on reading. I collected baseball cards and memorized every statistical line and all the colorful little stories on the back of them. It fascinated me that a fellow named Cookie Rojas, second baseman for the Philadelphia Phillies, actually wore glasses while playing big league baseball. How cool! I wore glasses, too. I learned Sandy Koufax was Jewish so I had to run to the J-volume of the encyclopedia to figure out what that meant. Houston built its Astros a domed stadium, so I had to do some digging to understand how such a huge edifice could stay standing.

And then, when I was 14 years old, the book Ball Four came out. It was an uncensored, straightforward look at the life of a big-leaguer. Ballplayers drank, chased women, had arguments with each other, felt they were underpaid, resented authority, divorced, remarried, gambled, went bankrupt, took “greenies” (amphetamines), and worried about what they’d do after their careers were over. The baseball establishment threw fits, saying it was all made up or that the author, pitcher Jim Bouton, had no right to write about such things. Me? I ate it all up. The more I read his book, the more I loved baseball.

Books have been my most treasured possessions all my adult life.

Now, here’s the irony. Because, as mentioned above, I wasn’t any teacher’s favorite student, I was constantly being punished. And the single most frequent punishment teachers threw at me was the dreaded 1000-word essay. I didn’t turn in my homework for the umpteenth time? Write a thousand words on why homework is important (now, nearly six decades later, I can complete that essay in two words: It isn’t.) A kid named Dennis Corso and I got into a fistfight during recess. He called me a dirty Jew. At the time I didn’t know what that meant but I could sense he wasn’t implying I was the coolest kid in class. So we blackened each other’s eye. The principal, who was a Jew, made us write a thousand words on a great Jewish person. I chose Benjamin Disraeli, British prime minister a couple of times in the 1800s. I knew of him from reading the encyclopedia, natch. I discovered that his old man had quit the faith when Benjamin was a kid. So, the first thing I ever really learned about Judaism was that people could become not-Jewish if they wanted.

Nevertheless, making me write a thousand words was as daunting as asking me to build a structure taller than the Empire State Building. If I recall correctly, I repeated a number of sentences several times to reach that magic number. I’m surprised the principal didn’t make me write a thousand words on why I shouldn’t cheat on 1000-word essays.

In any case, teachers and principals all did their best to make me hate writing. Writing, they taught me, was punitive and onerous. Writing is what bad kids had to do. It would be impossible to derive pleasure or satisfaction of any sort from the act of writing. And for a while I believed all those things. I learned to hate writing.

But by the time I was 21 or so, I realized writing was the thing I knew how to do best. And what was wrong with that? Hell, Jim Bouton‘s writing brought me huge pleasure. So did Wodehouse‘s and Bellow‘s and Lederman‘s and Allen‘s and Baldwin‘s and Lebowitz‘s and Royko‘s and…, well, the list can go on forever. Or at least a thousand words.

Now that I write for the sheer pleasure of it (and, throughout my adult life, for money) I want to throw a big finger back at all those who did their best to beat the love of writing out of me. Here’s my thousand words.