Crime Of The Century
So, al Qaeda and its brethren are taking over Iraq right before our very eyes.
Nice, huh?
Iraq’s Nightmare (Photo: Reuters)
■
Looks like those +125,000 dead Iraqis as well as 4400 dead US soldiers gave their lives for nothing.
Nothing, friends. Not a thing.
Did I mention we’d spent up to $4 trillion USD on that decade-long slaughter?
All because Georgy-Boy Bush and his coatholders and co-conspirators scared the bejesus out of us with talk of mushroom clouds and poison gas attacks — that weren’t going to come because bad old Saddam Hussein was nowhere near possessing such weapons (the nukes) or having the ability to deliver them (the gas) to New York City, Ellettsville, Wrigleyville and points west.
We fought that pointless, bullshit war because the Bush administration — which hadn’t been elected by a majority of American voters, in case you’ve forgotten — believed it was its god-given duty to remake the Middle East so that multinational engineering firms and oil companies could more easily and happily extract dollars therefrom. The fact that Georgy-Boy’s Poppy had not delivered said hegemony to the global plutocracy also was a motivating factor; the Bush family’s Big Dick legacy was preserved, thanks to the rivers of blood Shock and Awe produced.
Believe Us, America
■
Sadly, our holy land must reconcile itself to the reality that we have committed yet another crime against humanity.
Not that terribly many of us care.
▼
Hide Your Hate, America
And speaking of America’s crimes against humanity, we did our best to rectify a big one 50 years ago this summer. On July 2, 1964, President Lyndon Baines Johnson signed the comprehensive Civil Rights Act into law.
LBJ Gives Martin Luther King The Signing Pen (Photo: AP)
■
Throughout the first half of the year, though, the US Senate wrestled over the bill and, quite frankly, its passage was far from assured. Republican senators from southern states filibustered from late March through early June to prevent a vote. Senator Robert Byrd (D-West Virgina) alone filibustered for more than fourteen hours on June 10th. Before that, Senator Richard Russell (R-Georgia), told his colleagues, “We will resist to the bitter end any measure or any movement which would have a tendency to bring about social equality and intermingling and amalgamation of the races in our states.”
A small group of senators from both parties crafted a compromise bill that eventually passed, leading to the Johnson signing.
The bill, it should be noted, forbids discrimination by federal and state agencies against people on account of their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It also banned discrimination against those groups by businesses that provide “public accommodation” — hotels, for instance, and restaurants. The bill called for an end to unequal application of laws and eligibility requirements in voter registration as well as in school admissions.
Imagine that respected senators could stand in loud and forceful opposition to those ideals and not be pilloried. Things are different today, of course. People have learned how to hide such bigotry behind code words and misdirection.
At least we don’t tolerate blatant assholery anymore.
▲
Regarding Iraq: things do look bad but taking over is one thing, governing is another. They have had a taste of Democracy, let’s see what happens. A point of order, Sen. Robert Byrd of W. Virginia was a Democrat.
Right you are, David. The correction has been made. It’s easy to confuse the segregationist, old-line southern Democrats with the Republican Party that welcomed them with open arms.
Well played sir!
Mike, I just thought of something: Was Sen. Byrd’s change of heart re Civil Rights a political decision or did reason trump intuition?